Intl System GOV 207

Home Up Level of Analysis Global Actors Foreign Policy Decision Making Models State System Int Conflict

 

International System or
The Global System

I:      Defining Terms
II:     The State System
III:    International Actors
IV:   Power, Bases of State Power, Tools of State Power
V:     The Level of Analysis Problem
VI:      Foreign Policy
VII:     Foreign Policy Making Models
VIII:    History of the State System
IX:     Nationalism
X:      Worldviews
XI:     Managing the World System

Kegley, Charles W. Jr.  World Politics:  Trend and Transformation, 11th Ed. Belmont,
     CA:  Thomson Learning, Inc., 2007

Barry B. Hughes, Continuity and Change in World Politics, 3rd Ed.   Upper Saddle River,
     NJ:  Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1997)

 

I:      Defining Terms

The Global Political System.  How is the world organized politically? 

 The global system is the term used to describe the most inclusive of human social system.  It is a system of systems. 

 The global system can be analyzed, like all social system, through the structural-functional method in terms of its spatial, political, economic, cultural, and sociological dimensions.  Geographically, the global system refers to the entire planet earth.  Politically, the world is divided into 192 independent, sovereign, territorially defined member-states of the United Nations and some other territories.  Culturally, the world may be divided into eight broad culture regions, many world religions, language groups, and a large number of nationalities, ethnic minorities, and indigenous peoples.  Economically, the world is divided into the Global North and the Global South.  Market economies predominate within the global economic system.  Rapid globalization is proceeding throughout the planet.  Sociologically, the world contains more than 6.4 billion human beings organized into families, clans, tribes, ethnic, religious, and linguistic minorities, and many cultures dominant in particular states. There is as yet neither a universal global culture nor is there a global government.  The global system remains anarchic with only rudimentary decision making structures.

 The global political system is synonymous with the terms international system and international political system.  Our course, International Politics, attempts to explain both global politics and the global decision-making process.  How, within the global system, is it determined “who, gets what, when, and how.”  Who are the global or international actors, whose actions and decisions, determine the future of the world.

 The primary international actors continue to be the central governments of the sovereign states of the world.  These governmental actors may be classified in terms of their relative power.  Powerful states or the Great Powers, as they have been traditionally called, have dominated the international system.  Until very recently, the global political system was considered to have been exclusively a “state system or system of states”  Since World War I, the League of Nations and its successor organization, the United Nations, have transformed this state system.  International organizations, or more properly Inter-governmental organizations (IGOs), have added a new dimension to the state system.  Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), in particular multi-national corporations, form another category of international actors.  In addition to these organizational actors, both governmental and non-governmental, various social groupings—religious, ethnic, and linguistic—can become international actors, usually on a sporadic basis.  Riots, demonstrations, and revolutions can alter the international system.  These religious, ethnic, and linguistic societal communities may provide the backdrop out of which various organized groups emerge.  Militias, political parties, and terrorist organizations have their roots and support in various publics or societal communities.  Private individuals, independent of their organizational roles, play minor roles within the international system unless aggregated into categories like tourists, refugees, displaced persons, etc.

The global political system is so complex that it is difficult to describe and almost impossible to explain.  A myriad of cultural and organizational patterns interweave with each other.  One of the more useful concepts used in trying to unravel these complexities is the concept of “the level of analysis.”

added November 30, 2006

A: Global System, International System, International Relations, International Politics, and Comparative Foreign Policies

Global System:  The same idea as that of the international system, but it avoids the ambiguous term "international." 

International System: The most inclusive system involving human beings, human cultures, societal communities, and states. All international actors and all transnational activities are included.

International Relations: The totality of political and non-political interactions taking place within the international system.

International Politics or World Politics: Concerns itself primarily with the political interactions of international actors within the international system. The behavior of central governments of sovereign states continues to be the primary concern of international politics. The interrelationships of nation-states with each other and other international actors constitute the subject matter of international politics. The exercise of power and authority are the primary concern of politics. The resolution of international conflicts, including the role of war within the international system, are the focus of this field of study. High politics concerns itself with international conflicts, conflict resolution, and war. Since nuclear war may be suicidal and has become unthinkable, low politics has become ever more important. Low politics concerns itself with international trade, aid, health, environment, and other economic and social issues.

Foreign Policy: The goals, objectives, and tools used by central governments in their relationships with other sovereign, central governments of states and other international actors. U.S. foreign policy, Russian foreign policy, Chinese foreign policy may be studied separately. Comparative foreign policies compare how different central governments deal with their own questions of national security. Common patterns of how central governments conduct their respective foreign policies may give rise to various principles of international politics. For example, the principle of the balance of power may be abstracted from the ways in which central governments relate to each other.

B.  States, Nations, Countries, Societies

No Global Community or Society. The International Systems remains primarily a State System. No global culture exists as yet, but there are the beginnings of some common elements: World airport culture; global communications network; global banking system; pop music; Americanization of the world; Hollywood and  Bollywood culture; Coca Cola culture; Scotch and soda cocktail culture, etc.

No world government exists as yet. The United Nations is not a world government, but it could be a first tentative step in that direction. States remain the primary organizational and cultural units within the world today. All states are considered legally equal to all other states. Sovereign equality of states is a legal principle, but not a fact. Some states are more powerful than others. Superpowers, great powers, minor powers, hegemonic leadership by powerful states within a particular region of the globe, and spheres of influence continue to be a factual characteristics of the international system. The system remains anarchic. A de facto balance of power provides some stability.

The international system is anarchic and it has no central center of authority. It differs profoundly from its dominant units which are called states, nation states, state societies, or similar terms.

SOCIETIES: Societies are the largest human collectivities that are culturally and organizationally integrated. See Talcott Parsons for a description of the requisite functions which any society needs to perform in order to survive over time. This includes primitive societies which have not yet developed bureaucratic institutions or centralized governments. Sometimes these are called stateless societies.

STATE: According to international law, a state has the following four characteristics:

bulletTerritory
bulletHuman Population
bulletAn Effective Central Government, and
bulletSovereignty.

    Sovereignty: factual and normative dimension.

       Factual question:  Does the central government, in fact, have effective control?

        Normative questionIs the central government officially recognized by other central governments (sovereign states) as legitimate under international law?

                Absolute and Relative Sovereignty?    

                Limits on sovereignty:
                     The rule of law
                     Power as a limit

Recognition of States differs from recognition of governments.

The rise (birth) and fall (death) of states: USSR, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia.

Changes of government within a continuing, legally recognized State. For example, Germany under the Kaiser, Weimar, Hitler, Allied Occupation, East and West Germany, Reunified Germany. 

The question of revolution and its impact on a given state.

STATE-SOCIETIES: Largest culturally and organizationally integrated human collectivities.

COUNTRY:     territorial unit
              emotional attachment to place;
              territorial imperative;
              my country right or wrong;
              patriotism and nationalism

NATION:       cultural emphasis;
               from clan to tribe to nation
               common language, religion, history;
               nationalism

Nationalism is an ideology.  Many consider it the most powerful of the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries. It had its origins in the French Revolution.  At first nationalism was linked to liberalism and democratic ideals (the nation is the people), later, by the 1860s, it was linked to conservative, monarchical, militaristic, and imperialistic values. See below.

SOCIETAL-COMMUNITY:
May be defined as a cultural community which has not achieved statehood.

The Basques of Spain;
The Kurds of Iran, Iraq, and Turkey 
may be viewed as societal communities. 

Many African States are multi-tribal and/or multi-national.
These different cultural groups may be viewed as
so many different societal communities.

Ethnically diverse societies pose many problems for government.
Ethnic cleansing by the Serbian dominated government of the former Yugoslavia. The Chechens within the "new" Russian Federation. Shias and Sunnis within Iraq.

II: THE GLOBAL SYSTEM

Characteristics of the Global System

Geographic Characteristics.

This Planet called Earth is divided into seven continents.  These are Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Europe, North America, South America, and Oceania (including Australia).

Some 6.6 billion people live on our planet in 2007.  This number is expected to increase to 8 to 9 billion before it stabilizes.

Politically, the planet is divided into more than 192 independent sovereign states.
 

Cultural Characteristics

Culturally, this planet may be divided into eleven major culture regions.
These have been labeled as European, Anglo American, Austral-European, "Latin" American, Slavic, Islamic, Sub-Saharan African, Sino-Japanese, Indic, Southeast Asian, and Insular Oceanic.

 

There is as yet no Global Community or Society

No World Empire ruling over the entire world has ever been established in the entire history of the world.

No World Government has ever existed or exists at the present time.

The United Nations is not a World Government. It is a (nearly) universal International Organization (IO) or Intergovernmental Organization (IGO) with a membership of 192 Member States as of November 2006.  Switzerland became the 190th member-state on  September 10, 2002, Timor-L'Este joined as the 191st member on September 27, 2002 and Montenegro was added as the 192nd member on June 28, 2006. (See  http://www.un.org/Overview/unmember.html)

In addition to the 192 member-states of the United States, there are an additional dozen or so states that do not belong to the United Nations.  Taiwan is an example of a state, which for political reasons, has not been admitted to membership.  The Republic of China claims Taiwan as Chinese territory that will some day be reunified with the "homeland."  There are also a few remaining colonies, most of which have fewer than 500,000 inhabitants.  Altogether there are some 200 plus states in the world.  

THE GLOBAL SYSTEM remains predominantly a STATE SYSTEM, BUT NON-STATE ACTORS DO EXIST AND PLAY AN INCREASINGLY IMPORTANT ROLE WITHIN THE SYSTEM.

The World as a State System

The world is a system of states.  Politicians refer often to the community of states.  It should be noted that this "community" is not a community in the usual meaning of that word.  It is not a community of human beings sharing common values.  An assembly of heads of governments from 200 countries (that is a meeting of 200 men and women) is not a community of the world's peoples.  As stated above, there is as yet no global community of humanity nor a world government.

A multiplicity of states ultimately results in a kind of EQUILIBRIUM and a BALANCE OF POWER between these states.

TYPES OF BALANCE OF POWER SYSTEMS:

    GLOBAL BALANCE OF POWER

Multipolarity characterized the international system for most of its history from its beginning after the Thirty Years war in 1648 through the end of World War II in 1945.  Five to nine major powers predominated in the system.  The system was basically Euro-centric.

Major Powers:  France, United Kingdom, Spain, Austria-Hungary, Russia, Prussia (Germany after 1871), Italy (after 1860), United States, Japan

Bipolarity characterized the international system for two periods: 
    a.  just before World War I when the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy) confronted the Triple Entende (United Kingdom, France, and Tsarist Russia) and again
    b. after World War II when the United States (and its Allies organized in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization--NATO) confronted the Soviet Union (and its Satellites, using a perjorative term, organized in the Warsaw Pact). With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, this bipolar system came to an end. 

Hegemonic Dominance of the United States marks the period since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.  The United States has emerged as the world's only superpower.

The international system has seen previous periods of hegemonic predominance.  At the beginning of the formation of the modern State System, Habsburg Spain came close to establishing its dominance over Europe.  Later France under Louis XIV and again under Napoleon threatened the existence of the state-system.  After 1871, Germany gained predominance within Central Europe and threatened the system in World Wars I and II.

Hegemonic predominance has generally led to the formation of coalition or alliance of states to check the power of the dominant state.

So far, hegemonic states have failed to institutionalize their power.  If successful, the hegemon would establish a world empire or world state in place of the existing state system based on the sovereign equality of states.

    REGIONAL BALANCES OF POWER.  In addition to the global balance of power, there are also various regional balances.  The regional balance of power will be determined largely by the countries that are located in the given region.  However, the dominant hegemonic state and other major powers, not located in the given region, may also play a role in the given region.  The United States, for example, is an actor in all the regional balances of power within the world.

    ALLIANCES and the Balance of Power, both Global and Regional.  States form alliances to increase the power that they exercise in the world.  This is true both of major powers and weak states.  Hegemonic states assemble alliances to gain both legitimacy for their actions and to achieve overwhelming superiority over their adversaries.  Weak states seek to build alliances to compensate for their weaknesses.

    WAR, unfortunately, remains a normal condition within this system of sovereign states.  Despite efforts to establish peaceful methods of conflict resolution between states, the international system remains anarchic.  The international system continues to remain in a Hobbesian State of Nature where each "warres" against all.

WAR is a normal condition within a system of states.  There are are many different types of war.  
Wars are classified:
    a.   according to the types of weapons used.  For example,
         nuclear and non-nuclear or conventional wars.
    b.   according to the geographic extent of the war.
         For example, global or world wars wars and civil wars.
    c.   according to the power of the belligerents.  For
         example, major powers fighting each other (world
                    wars; minor powers fighting in a particular region 
                     (wars between India and Pakistan).
    d.         according to the level of violence used.  Terrorism appears to be
                 a new kind of low level warfare.  

TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES AND WARFARE.

    Nuclear Weapons since 1947.  Nuclear Powers and Non-Nuclear Countries.  Nuclear Proliferation.

    Chemical Weapons have been used at least since World War I

    Biological Weapons.  Germ warfare.  As far as we know, this has not been used in actual warfare but there is a growing risk that it may be used particularly by weak states and terrorist organizations.

    ABC Weapons:  Atomic, Biological, Chemical

THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM remains predominantly a STATE SYSTEM;   

Global Balance of Power

            Military              Economic
              Superpower

                US                    US
                                                                                      Japan
                                                                                      European Union
                                                                                      USSR
                                                                                     China
                                                                                      India

Regional Balances of Power

North America
    Canada, US, and Mexico

Central America and Caribbean
    Panama, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Honduras, Cuba, Haiti

South America
    Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Bolivia, Columbia, Venezuela

Pacific Region
    Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia, Philippines

East Asia
    China, Korea, Japan

South East Asia
    Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Burma, Thailand

South Asia
    Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan

Middle East
    Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Emirates, Syria,
    Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon

North Africa
    Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya

Sub-Saharan Africa
    Nigeria, Ghana, Congo (Zaire), Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania

South Africa
    Republic of South Africa, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Zambia

Eastern Europe
    Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania

Western Europe
    United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Spain

Antarctica

High Seas

Outer Space

3.  Global Actors
Check more detailed information on my Global Actors page

Global-Level Actors
    United Nations
    Other Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs)
    Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
    Multinational Corporations (MNCs)
    Transnational Banks (TNBs)

State-Level Actors
    Central Governments of Sovereign States
    Regional, Local, and City Governments of States
   
Private Bureaucracies
        Corporations
        Catholic Church
    Voluntary Associations
        Political Parties
        Chambers of Commerce
    Criminal Associations and Organizations
        Drug Cartels
        Terrorist Organizations
    Societal Communities
        Ethnic Communities
        Religious Communities
        Indigenous People

Individual-level Actors
    Individuals
    Tourists
    Traveling Businesspeople
    Ex-public officials
    Movie Stars and Starlets
    Public Officials

IV: POWER, BASES OF STATE POWER, TOOLS OF STATE POWER

POWER is an elusive concept but widely used in political science.  Power may be defined as the ability to persuade others to do things that they would not do ordinarily unless pressured to do so.  Within domestic politics, power is usually based on numbers, wealth, and organizational skills.  A small group that is well organized may exercise considerable influence even without large sums of money.  In international politics, power depends on both geopolitical factors and idiosyncratic factors.

Inequalities of State Power

bulletSuperpowers
bulletMajor Powers
bulletMinor States
bulletClient States
bulletMini- and Micro-States
bulletDependencies
bulletColonies

Bases of State Power

Bases of National Power depends on many variables, such as:

    Geopolitical Factors

bulletLocation of the state--coastal or landlocked
bulletSize--large or small territory
bulletPopulation--large or small
bulletNatural Resources--oil, iron ore, forests, etc.
bulletTechnology-developed or under-developed
bulletType of Government--dictatorship or democracy
bulletType of Economy--market or centrally planned
bulletSize and Equipment of Military--nuclear or conventional

Idiosyncratic Factors
bulletWill and Leadership
bulletMorale of Military
bulletDegree of Popular Support
bulletNature of Friends and Allies 
bulletNature of Foes and Enemies

Tools of State Power for the Conduct of Foreign Policy

bulletDiplomacy
bulletForeign Aid
bulletForeign Trade
bulletPropaganda
bulletCultural Exchange Programs
bulletIntelligence Operations
bulletOvert and Covert Operations
bulletSubversion
bulletTerrorism
bulletEconomic Warfare
bulletTrade Wars
bulletPrice Fixing
bulletDumping
bulletTrade Embargo
bulletSeizure of Assets
bulletCurrency Manipulations
bulletDenial of Raw Materials
bulletBoycott
bulletBreaking Diplomatic Relations
bulletGunboat Diplomacy
bulletMilitary Maneuvers
bulletQuarantine
bulletBlockade
bulletWar

V:     The Level of Analysis Problem
VI:      Foreign Policy
VII:     Official Decision Making Models
 

VIII:  HISTORY OF THE STATE SYSTEM
For more detailed information go to History of the State System


Barry B. Hughes, Continuity and Change in World Politics (1991), Cht 8, pp. 218 - 232

Evolution of the Modern Nation State.

Feudal kingdoms --> Absolute monarchies --> Modern states

Progression of human societies from clans, tribe, city-state, kingdoms, empires, states, nations, nation state, world state?

Hegemon, Hegemony, Hegemonic Leadership; Spheres of Influence

Role of Technology and Commerce

Gunpowder, handguns, cannons, rifles

Fall of Constantinople (Byzantium) in 1453 by Ottoman Turks using cannons to breach impregnable fortifications

Battleships, submarines, aircraft carriers

Blitzkrieg: massed tanks and fighter aircraft.

Nuclear weapons; Strategic Air Command; Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles

Important Treaties

Treaty of Westphalia 1648

Treaty of Utrecht 1714

Congress of Vienna 1815

Treaty of Versailles 1919

Hegemonic Leaders

Spain: 16th and first half of 17th centuries
        Land and naval dominance

United Provinces of the Netherlands
        Naval dominance; 17th century

France: second half of 17th and 18th centuries
        Land dominance to 1871

United Kingdom:
        Naval dominance to 1945

1588 Spanish Armada defeated;

1689 Glorious Revolution;

1815 Victory over Napoleon; Congress of Vienna; 

1945 World War II ends; US Replaces UK as dominant naval power.

Germany: 1871 - 1945.
        Land dominance in Europe;

Some effort to build a navy

USSR 1917 - 1991;

        Russian Revolution, 1917
                February Revolution--Bourgeois Revolution, Liberal and Democratic, Kerensky Regime
                October Revolution--Bolshevik Revolution, Communists, Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin

        Superpower after 1945
        Collapse of the Soviet Union and the Soviet Empire,
                    1989 - 1991

US: 1890 -
        Dominance in the Americas after Spanish American War 1898
        Superpower after 1945
        Sole Superpower (Hegemon) after 1991

Three Worlds of Economic Development

First World: Free Market Economies

Second World:  Former State-Run Economies; former communist countries

Third World: Developing World: Underdeveloped Countries

Changing Regimes

Elections, the Middle Class, and Democracy

Internal Coup d'Etat

Revolution

Civil War

Foreign Interventions

Major Wars

Types of Societies

Traditional Societies

Transitional Societies

Modern Societies

Dependency Relationships

Colonialism and Imperialism

Winds of Change: Anti-Colonialism

Spheres of Influence

Hegemony

Junior Partners in Alliance Systems

IX:  NATIONALISM

Nations, Nationalism, Modern Nation-State System

Religion, Religious Communities, Secular Religions, Ideologies, Universalism. Zealots, Terrorists, and Revolutionaries. Capturing Control of the State through Elections, Coup, or Revolution

X:  WORLDVIEWS

A Science of Politics? Facts and Values. Empirical and Normative. Description and Prescription. Opinions and Beliefs.

Data, Facts, Concepts, Propositions, Theories. World Views.

Unpatterned Information, Generality, Explanation, Prescribe.

Regional cultures. Regional Balances of Power. Civilizations.

The International System. Global Balance of Power. High Politics. Political-Military Power. Low Politics. Economic Power. Ecological Dynamics.

Competing World Views:

    Realism and Idealism;

    Liberalism and Structuralism;

    Modernism (Progress) and Eco-pessimism.

XI:  MANAGING THE GLOBAL SYSTEM

It seems to me that every central government of a sovereign state-society seeks to

1.  Protect its own National Security
2.  Promote its own Domestic Prosperity
3.  Maintain its own National Values and Culture
4.  Demand Respect for its own Values, Traditions, and Beliefs
5.  Increase its own Power and Influence in the World; and
6.  Remain in office as long as is possible
7.  Manage, maintain, modify the existing Global System in ways benefiting that particular state.  This includes making alliances, subverting or supporting other states, and system maintenance. States have been classified into those seeking to maintain the given status quo and those countries trying to change the given status quo.

Looked at from a Global Level of Analysis, the Global System can be managed through:

1. Maintenance of the Global Balance of Power

2. Collective Security

3. Conquest and Expansion

4.  Hegemony

5.  World Empire

6.  World Federalism

7.  Functionalism

8.  Gradually Building a Global Community

a. Global "Coca Cola" or Airport Culture

b. Pop English

c. Global Marketplace and growing World Prosperity

d. World Tourism

e. Communications Revolution through Internet

f. Security Communities

g. Functional Integration through IOs

h.  Technological Change

i.  Globalization and growing interdependence

9.  World War, Ecological Collapse, or Other Cataclysm that Forces Radical System Transformation

 Updated August 27, 2007
Copyright Dr. Harold Damerow
Union County College
Cranford, NJ